Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fiona Thomas's avatar

Majestic piece of writing… And exactly what I’ve been saying, although not as articulately of course, for the last few years. The belief that there is something bigger than us has been intrinsic to the soul of man since he has walked the Earth. Secularism, whilst rejecting shackles of control frameworks placed upon us by religions, allow other more damaging alternatives, namely, the psychopath.

Literally all the world’s problems, historically and currently are caused by one man thinking he has the right to force another down a particular path, and as Jenny says; it is generally men.

Bloody good article. More please 🙏

Expand full comment
J.J. Hayes's avatar

It kind of reminds of The Rebel by Camus. Having killed God we humans ended up filling the void with these revolutionary totalitarian systems which have the state making the same claims to the individual that the now dead god allegedly once did. Strangely, the logic is inescapable. I was reflecting the other day on the age old "proof" that "God" does not exist - namely that an all powerful all good being would not allow evil to exist. On the other hand if there is nothing out there, it is all relative and there is no standard by which we might judge any action or occurrence to be evil or good. So really the proponent of this proof is saying is that they actually know what an omniscient omnipotent infinite being would do if an omniscient omnipotent infinite being existed, and since the world isn't that way then this being can't exist. The next logical though unspoken step is that the proponent of the argument must be the equivalent of God, knowing just how the world should be, which is the basic assumption of the argument. Being omniscient as to how the world should be, the only option is to seek omnipotence. Finitude gets in the way, but humans seem intent on getting around that limitation as well.

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts