42 Comments
Jul 2, 2023Liked by Jenny Holland

I agree with everything you have written here, once again. When we do watch the main stream media, we are a palled at how they purposely do not cover news stories. Anyone that is solely following these media outlets is completely in the dark. I see something far more insipid going on here, it’s slowly turning Americans into morons. Our educational system is another sample of this process. I fear for my grandchildren.

Expand full comment

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol No. 7 – World-Wide Wars

❝We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war.❞

https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-no-7-world-wide-wars

Expand full comment

Excellent article ... however, Jenny, :) ... on Trump I am not sure he is, relatively speaking, deserving of all the criticism he gets about his character ... from and including Kennedy, the three presidents with the least amount of blood on their hands are Kennedy, Carter and Trump, and Trump might even be the one with the absolute least number of collateral damage victims. Reagan, the Republican who is much adored is blood stained in proxy wars, GW Bush is the worst, and Obama helped destroy Libya and Syria ... so much for his Nobel Peace Prize. If one is a survivor of American war mongering in some God forsaken part of the world, the unrelenting attack on Trump as a character will be puzzling ... all that blood and gore and Americans are worrying about the manners of Trump!? The best that America has to offer right now against the corruption of its democracy are the likes of Trump, RFK, WIlliamson, De Santis and some of the other quieter Republican candidates but definitely not Christie nor Haley or Pence. There is the gift of Tulsi Gabbard too, ah, but one may as well be throwing pearls at swine ...

Expand full comment
author

Yeah, I understand what you mean, and I think about this a lot. I just think that everything to do with Trump is so hysterical that I deliberately withhold my judgement. But I think he sabotaged his own stated, populist agenda by surrounding himself with people who obviously undermined him, his COVID policies were questionable and his inability to rise above petty nonsense created unnecessary drama. He's also just too damn old! Is it too much to ask that a president is younger than 80?? 🤣

Expand full comment

He has a way of offering his throat to be cut by the interests, the Elitist Complex, whose cheese is being moved by him ... the same interests who feel threatened by the new Kennedy ... or by Tulsi Gabbard for that matter, who in my opinion would have beaten Trump by a number of past, present and future universes, including the parallel ones too ... :)

Expand full comment

Dr.SHIVA™ LIVE: The Mythos of the Kennedy "Royalty" Enslaves America. Time to Break Free . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX5upBRlDqY

Expand full comment

Holy cow. I hadn’t followed any of this story at all. Thanks for your analysis. It makes the UK look positively pedestrian in its politics. I listened to the Australian news piece. I repeat: holy cow!

Expand full comment
author

I know!!! It just goes to show what a good job the media did in obscuring how terrible the Biden family is.

Expand full comment

Thoughts on Britain’s “Rwanda Plan” . . .

“It seems fair to conclude that Jewish organizations have uniformly advocated high levels of immigration of all racial and ethnic groups into Western societies and have also advocated a multicultural model for these societies.” — Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2022/05/06/thoughts-on-britains-rwanda-plan/

Expand full comment

Brilliant again. You voice so accurately the frustration I feel when faced with the choices the media wants us to have. In 2016, I could not believe this huge beautiful nation could not produce any better candidates than Orange Man and Crooked? I know there are intelligent, principled people we could vote for without feeling we had just voted for Swamp Thing. Where are they? Buried by a media establishment choosing candidates based on their drama quotient rather than their principles.

Expand full comment
Jul 2, 2023Liked by Jenny Holland

Can you make the Australian Anchor link live? I am unable to locate it because it doesn’t connect to anything.

Expand full comment
author

The link was down at the bottom but I added it further up as well!

Expand full comment
Jul 2, 2023·edited Jul 2, 2023

Love your comment on leftist media as "the Pravda of today." I too was not afraid to listen to conservative media and I too have known for years about Biden family corruption. The cover up by leftist media (a big factor in the 2020 election results by the way) reminds me of Jerimiah 5:21-28 which refers to "...foolish people and without understanding which have eyes, and see not, which have ears and hear not...their houses are full of deceit; they have become rich and powerful...Their evil deeds have no limit..."

Expand full comment

I didn’t need right-wingers to make me aware of the horror show that is Joe Biden’s Traveling Circus of Corruption and Evil. Plenty of truly progressive journalists online to point that out. And some of us oldies have know what Biden was since the ‘90s. I would never vote for him.

Unlike you, I couldn’t vote for Trump and there were no Dem candidates other than Tulsi Gabbard I could vote for )(and I did). 2024? I won’t vote for Biden or Trump this time either. Kennedy? West? I have yet to decide or think overly hard about that. But I am listening.

Expand full comment
founding

"Right Wingers". Good lord you label crazy people are exhausting.

How about an even minimally competent mainstream press?

Expand full comment

I was specifically replying to words in the article.

Expand full comment

"the biggest threat to the health of the American republic right now is, in fact, the mainstream media. Even more than the permanent bureaucracy or the influence peddling of the Uniparty, "

After 2020, this view of a disjointed problem, where sectors are not seen to be in interlocking cooperation, is no longer tenable or reasonable. It's more reasonable to assume there is an internationally coordinated pan-Western Industrial Complex comprising ALL major sectors & institutions of society -- including news media, as well as governments, public health, medicine, academe, public schools, big business, banks, unions, arts & entertainment... Did I leave anything out?

And from there, we reasonably infer that this international coordination is sinister, not benign, and is aiming at a subversion of the West in order to replace it with a totalitarian new world order. One big thing it depends upon for the success of its sinister project is for otherwise intelligent analysts to assume it doesn't exist.

Expand full comment

Reading so-called "right-wing" liberal news, "left-wing" liberal news and/or conspiracy theories is that they may all frequently publish some facts, with the latter even more so, but their conclusions about those facts are spectacularly WRONG. The two former especially with their left/right ruling class

"arguments" about said facts driven to their lies with a conscious purpose while again, the latter thinks independently without a conscious purpose to be a lying sack of shit, yet is still WRONG. Right/left is two sides of ONE political economy---ours being classical liberal. Economics is what drives politics.

We have a spectator sports political set up---where none of our interests actually "interest" the political system. People vote for one team or the other from the stands. Both teams are playing the same GAME and you are simply watching and brainlessly cheering for one team or the other. That's material reality. We who are not the owners have ALWAYS been politically homeless (powerless.) Any gains under this "democracy" are illusory and are taken away at will when it suits our owners to do so. See the tranny shit as an example that illustrates this point. No matter how fucking STUPID their sophistry is---like claiming you are the opposite sex, if it serves the interests of $$$$ all those so-called "rights" people believe they have are gone in a puff of smoke for an imaginary group of "different" people who are materially still male or female as they day the morons were born. I'd call that having temporary privileges to borrow a phrase from George Carlin.

Woke is my favorite false dichotomy (that one either is or isn't if a member of our fascist state (the "right/left" when it's ONE political party that gives the illusion to the weak-minded that they are different and represent OUR interests.) Woke serves as a tool to repress the lower classes (including the so-called middle one if necessary and occasionally a member of the rulers themselves--like Trumpy) and the MAJORITY of people in Western nations who are white (the largest grouping of people who really scare the owners---it's simple math.) And while the "right" of our political whore class PRETEND WOKE doesn't serve their interests, it is a lie. It most certainly does and they WILL utilize it against anyone who objects to our owners' oppression. In reality, everyone IS "politically homeless" because a capitalist state only represents the interests of the RICH and serves to oppress/repress the "lower" classes. Most pigs are "right-wing" armed men of the STATE who carry out its will on behalf of the OWNERS of this place, yet will arrest you in a minute if they are TOLD and using WOKE to do it--no matter what any sophistry known as LAW says or doesn't say. (That's a whole other topic unto itself.) Maybe people should start THINKING? Judges, DA's etc. with D's and R's after their names will BOTH use WOKE to repress your ass into silence at best and a jail cell using violence and or loss of employment if we move lower down the scale. No matter their initials after their names. It's material reality. It has also always been this way. The "right" cheerleaders (mostly working class people) of that Jan. 6 protest should be figuring out right about now, that they scared the rulers by protesting and their precious "right-wing" REPUBLICANS prosecuted them and sought harsh sentences without giving them any aid whatsoever. A thinking person should see this. Do people think only the "judges" and "prosecutors" with D's after their names are charging and trying these people and/or upholding their sentences? Two examples should suffice to get minds moving.

Voting for Trump is probably a fun thing to do that pisses people off but materially no matter which ass is in the executive chair we will materially gain not a goddamned thing. As for rights, again, quoting George Carlin: They are a cute idea. Cute and FICITONAL. I recommend people get a good laugh while learning the TRUTH of the matter.

Expand full comment

“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are weasel words used to hide the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.

How the 'Grift Right' Gimps for the Left . . . Steven Crowder almost became Mel Gibson and Kanye West by accident . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/how-the-grift-right-gimps-for-the

The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds . . . https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/

Expand full comment

Good article Jenny except for one thing - it wasn't "the elites" who put Donald Trump in the White House, it was the average American Joe. Trump became president because voters picked him in the primaries then they voted for him in an election the media predicted Hillary Clinton, the most corrupt politician to ever live, would win. Then in 2020, more people voted for Trump than had voted for ANY presidential candidate in history. Yes, Biden supposedly got more but those votes are suspect, although the media ignores it and the courts simply wanted to stay out of it. Trump is popular for one simple reason - the average American loves him.

Expand full comment

Did an average American Joe get him into the primary? Yeah, didn't think so. Only the rich can afford to run for office.

Expand full comment

So what? As I recall, there were about half a dozen, maybe a dozen, in the primary and they were all knocked off. I early voted for Jeb Bush in the Texas primary but he withdrew before election day so my vote didn't count. There have been a lot of rich men (and women) who ran for office but didn't get elected. Sure, it takes money but if I remember correctly, Donald Trump paid his own way. The big money people supported others. What got me was people who voted for Ted Cruz who isn't even constitutionally eligible to be president. He was born in Canada and became a naturalized citizen whenever his mother got around to reporting his birth.

Expand full comment

Was that comment of yours meant to disprove only rich people not average Joes running for office, leaving the average Joe's only able to vote for a rich person? And whether or not Trump paid his own way is not relevant to that. Still rich and ONLY rich can afford to run and THAT means only the avg. Joe's can vote in a rich person. Big $$$ will sponsor whichever corporate whore will do their bidding to run for office, usually another rich asshole, leaving no one else for the avg. Joe to vote for.

You are correct about Cruz.

They're all nothing more than corporate whores (Obama, Clinton) or corporate pimps themselves (Bush/Trump) that's really all that's left for anyone to vote for. And none of them represent the interests of the masses. They're two sports teams playing a game and we're just watching. Voting gets one or the other team in to rob the public treasury and make laws to oppress the masses and enrich themselves or their pimps.

Expand full comment

I don't know how well you know American history, but it's ALWAYS been those of means who run for office. George Washington was hardly a pauper. Neither was Jefferson, Adams, Madison or any of the early presidents. Andrew Jackson may have started out poor but he had become rich as a lawyer and land speculator. (Not so) Honest Abe made a big deal out of being a rail splitter in his younger days but by the time he ran for office he had become a successful lawyer representing the railroads. In short, "average Joes" are not going to be able to run for office but they most definitely vote, and it's the voters who chose the candidates in the primaries. As for "representing the interests of the masses", that's what communism and socialism are all about, except their philosophy is for the intellectuals to be in charge and to take care of the masses.

Still, anyway you want to slice it, Trump was nominated by average Joes and elected by them. Biden's people came along and used nefarious means (and money) to manipulate the vote with mail-in ballots which are easily duplicated.

Incidentally, I doubt there is an "average Joe" capable of running the country. Most have a hard enough time running their own household. I assume you know that the Founders never intended for anyone to vote other than property owners.

Expand full comment

God bless Vinnie and those like him. Last 3 years have been humbling.

Expand full comment

Oh Jenny. Jenny, Jenny, Jenny. My sweet summer child. The Biden’s are like the Clinton’s. They are protected.

Expand full comment
founding

Absolutely SPOT ON, as always. You are truly a treasure.

Expand full comment

Jenny - speaking of Kristol - he rang for Governor of Oregon in the last election. O f course I don't know for sure but having read him for years when I did actually read the NYTs I wondered why he would leave the glory and prestiage of being a Time's columnist to run in Oregon.

He has a ranch in southeastern Oregon - the very conservative part of the State - which has been in his family for years. He evidently visits the ranch when he isn't traveling with the Times and I could only guess he was getting bored . . He did sponsor a contest yearly for young people and took the winner to places like Somalia for them to see for themselves what he wrote about. I thought that a good thing

For him to think he had the cred to run for Govenor was rather a joke. Except for those of us who read the Times and k new of him, most people did not. Putting on a western shirt and a pair of cowboy boots so that he could pass for a working rancher , did not hide the fact that he was a died in the wool New Yorker, In fact, I thought it was incredibly egotistical for him to think that his occasional visits to a ranch in Oregon qualified him in any way to be Governor. Of course, Oregon is noted to find the most unqualified person for the job, but this time it wasn't Kristol. He lost and quietly went back to writing for the Times.

Expand full comment

"Oregon is noted to find the most unqualified person for the job, . . . "

The elections are rigged and have been since Oregon did all mail-in voting.

Expand full comment

I’ve enjoyed your slant for a while now.

I’ve been forced into retirement, broke, or I’d buck up for you, myself, right now. Working on it… meanwhile…

Thanks

Expand full comment

Pardon…

D’ope

Expand full comment