Society celebrates the hideous, the deviant and the compulsively transgressive. The result? Fat Satan aka Sam Smith, and other -- far more horrifying-- things
In a way I'm glad that the Woke are doubling down on gender ideology. They've chosen the perfect hill to die on. It gives me hope that the Woke house of cards could come crashing down all at once.
Excellent piece, Jenny! I was also aghast at BB's pro rape-porn guest and her complete rejection of sexual morality. Also I loved your phrase "go all Taliban on their knicker-wearing asses" lol.
There's a sad and terrifying game of civilizational chicken being played here: can western society successfully wait these people out? That is, can a society exist that gives these people just enough space to live their sad lives and die (because they don't reproduce), without becoming long-term damaged by it? That ignore-it-and-hope-it-goes-away mindset is what's keeping the baseball bats put away, for now. We'll see how long it lasts.
I think we're missing some important voices here; men who've worked at escorts. I spent a little bit of time talking to an adult male who had worked as an escort to wealthy women and he said it was a terrible business and the women and men who buy escorts love the power over another human being and he was usually treated very badly. The industry is not healthy for men or women.
My 90+ year old uncle predicted this when "Gay Marriage" was allowed. He said " It is not the normal
sexual preference, it should not be condoned. Let them do what they want in the privacy of their own homes but to condone it and make it appear as normal and as acceptable as the natural sexual preference is wrong. Because once you accept a difference sexual preference to the norm as being the same as the norm, at what point does society say this sexual preference is a preference too far?"
On the what I call "Trans Industrial Complex" Jon Uhler has serious experience with sex abuse counseling for some 30 years and it's heartening to see someone of his professional merit see that we are dealing with not merely some organic devolution in society, but also a concerted managed project by the Mainstream to promote this. Why the Mainstream would do this is of course a good question, but that it is doing it seems unreasonable to deny at this point.
Secondly, he sees it's not just an assault on women, it's also part of a darker process with a goal of normalizing pedophilia. He's back on Twitter from a ban, and he has a YT channel. @uhler_jon
The term "transgressive" sounds sort of cute, like being blissfully uninterested in every little insignificant man-made rule that somebody somewhere dreamed up when they didn't have anything better to do that day, but a lot of the stuff that we see today in many aspects of our culture is about something light years worse. It is about evil. God is not a fan of evil, and one's eternal destination is very much at stake if one chooses to persist in it and ignore or oppose God.
Once upon a time, we told pervs to "get a room". Now, thanks to social media, the whole world is their room. Personally I would be happy if all the satellites fall out of the sky ( or the Americans shoot them down)!
Great writing. That’s the crucial thing here. You can write anything if you write well. I really believe this. Art. The stuff about you as a kid in a Brooklyn school girl's room is great writing. I also owe you an email. ❤️
In the 18th century there was a lot of "accepted" debauchery. And then the backlash occurred and we get the 19th century apparent "prudity". Of course, it wasn't entirely that - victorians were a sexual as any humans through time, but there was more of a sense of it was private and not open to all.
There were moves to protect the child - children in the past were very often abused. It is one reason why girls in particular were so sheltered, made to understand that *reputation* was very important. Even in the more permissive 18th century (see the story of Dangerous Liaisons....bored wealthy people using sex to get their power kicks, and using anyone they like to do so. See also the Marquis de Sade).
Yet, a girl, in the 18th century who had any outside of marriage relations and it become known, was left on the proverbial shelf. 17th century Moll Flanders shows what happened to poorer women who had to make their way in life.
We are now in a situation whereby Females can control their fertility. The old concept of women can do and be "like" men (aka Ladette culture in the 90s) has now led to the concept that women can have open sexual relationships with no boundaries. Of course, if you are an adult, you can't be stopped from indulging *in your own private space with consenting adults*, but....the difference now is that there a vocal minority with an awful lot of influence and a set of politicians the world over who seem to be "so open minded their brains have fallen out" (thank you Magdalen Berns) who are listening too hard.
This influential minority see and saw a golden opportunity to perform their perversions (because rape kink is a perversion....NO ONE can consent to it even as role play) in the "public square" as it were **and thus to force everyone else to participate without consent**. The very fact that these perversions are being "normalised" in media, on the internet, in schools (yes! by the very fact of denying that sex is binary etc), in law (yes!! State sanctioning of these concepts.) means society as a whole is now involved.
Of course thats the other element. Its not very "power and euphoric" to do this at home and in private. So much better if others are forced to be involved even as voyeurs without consent and *without being able to challenge it lest they are deemed bigots or even worse arrested for some "hate crime"*.
But, the public will only go so far.
And the backlash could become very bloody and harsh.
The "weaker" ones - like the boy you mentioned - will be harmed first. The stronger ones will get harmed next. Those few who have decided that living as the opposite sex in whatever form they *think* that is but who do NOT impose on the spaces of the opposite sex, will become shameful collateral in this backlash. As will, I suspect, LGB whose genuine civil rights movement was to just be equal in that their sexual orientation was private but not grounds for discrimination.
The French Revolution started off with genuine issues due to the huge gaping chasm between rich and poor. However, too many of the aristocrats were killed who were innocent - they cared for their tenants, helped the poor and did what they could as was their duty. Children were executed - simply for being the child of an aristocrat. Poorer people and the bourgeoisie, who saw the revolution was going too far, were arrested and often were executed for not supporting the narrative.
The leaders of the Revolution then faced the backlash....even Robespierre - architect, followed the King and Queen to the guillotine.
I fear that when the backlash occurs - too many will be swept up as collateral...innocent victims and the pendulum will then swing too far the other way.
After a certain threshold is surpassed the only way to return BALANCE to it is by absolute destruction. In our case in entertainment this means biological extinction.
In a way I'm glad that the Woke are doubling down on gender ideology. They've chosen the perfect hill to die on. It gives me hope that the Woke house of cards could come crashing down all at once.
Excellent piece, Jenny! I was also aghast at BB's pro rape-porn guest and her complete rejection of sexual morality. Also I loved your phrase "go all Taliban on their knicker-wearing asses" lol.
There's a sad and terrifying game of civilizational chicken being played here: can western society successfully wait these people out? That is, can a society exist that gives these people just enough space to live their sad lives and die (because they don't reproduce), without becoming long-term damaged by it? That ignore-it-and-hope-it-goes-away mindset is what's keeping the baseball bats put away, for now. We'll see how long it lasts.
I think we're missing some important voices here; men who've worked at escorts. I spent a little bit of time talking to an adult male who had worked as an escort to wealthy women and he said it was a terrible business and the women and men who buy escorts love the power over another human being and he was usually treated very badly. The industry is not healthy for men or women.
My 90+ year old uncle predicted this when "Gay Marriage" was allowed. He said " It is not the normal
sexual preference, it should not be condoned. Let them do what they want in the privacy of their own homes but to condone it and make it appear as normal and as acceptable as the natural sexual preference is wrong. Because once you accept a difference sexual preference to the norm as being the same as the norm, at what point does society say this sexual preference is a preference too far?"
On the what I call "Trans Industrial Complex" Jon Uhler has serious experience with sex abuse counseling for some 30 years and it's heartening to see someone of his professional merit see that we are dealing with not merely some organic devolution in society, but also a concerted managed project by the Mainstream to promote this. Why the Mainstream would do this is of course a good question, but that it is doing it seems unreasonable to deny at this point.
Secondly, he sees it's not just an assault on women, it's also part of a darker process with a goal of normalizing pedophilia. He's back on Twitter from a ban, and he has a YT channel. @uhler_jon
Every day I think I can’t be surprised any more. And then, again, I’m proved wrong.
The term "transgressive" sounds sort of cute, like being blissfully uninterested in every little insignificant man-made rule that somebody somewhere dreamed up when they didn't have anything better to do that day, but a lot of the stuff that we see today in many aspects of our culture is about something light years worse. It is about evil. God is not a fan of evil, and one's eternal destination is very much at stake if one chooses to persist in it and ignore or oppose God.
Once upon a time, we told pervs to "get a room". Now, thanks to social media, the whole world is their room. Personally I would be happy if all the satellites fall out of the sky ( or the Americans shoot them down)!
I found the juxtaposition between power and dignity in this post interesting. Love your work, thanks ;-)
Great writing. That’s the crucial thing here. You can write anything if you write well. I really believe this. Art. The stuff about you as a kid in a Brooklyn school girl's room is great writing. I also owe you an email. ❤️
In the 18th century there was a lot of "accepted" debauchery. And then the backlash occurred and we get the 19th century apparent "prudity". Of course, it wasn't entirely that - victorians were a sexual as any humans through time, but there was more of a sense of it was private and not open to all.
There were moves to protect the child - children in the past were very often abused. It is one reason why girls in particular were so sheltered, made to understand that *reputation* was very important. Even in the more permissive 18th century (see the story of Dangerous Liaisons....bored wealthy people using sex to get their power kicks, and using anyone they like to do so. See also the Marquis de Sade).
Yet, a girl, in the 18th century who had any outside of marriage relations and it become known, was left on the proverbial shelf. 17th century Moll Flanders shows what happened to poorer women who had to make their way in life.
We are now in a situation whereby Females can control their fertility. The old concept of women can do and be "like" men (aka Ladette culture in the 90s) has now led to the concept that women can have open sexual relationships with no boundaries. Of course, if you are an adult, you can't be stopped from indulging *in your own private space with consenting adults*, but....the difference now is that there a vocal minority with an awful lot of influence and a set of politicians the world over who seem to be "so open minded their brains have fallen out" (thank you Magdalen Berns) who are listening too hard.
This influential minority see and saw a golden opportunity to perform their perversions (because rape kink is a perversion....NO ONE can consent to it even as role play) in the "public square" as it were **and thus to force everyone else to participate without consent**. The very fact that these perversions are being "normalised" in media, on the internet, in schools (yes! by the very fact of denying that sex is binary etc), in law (yes!! State sanctioning of these concepts.) means society as a whole is now involved.
Of course thats the other element. Its not very "power and euphoric" to do this at home and in private. So much better if others are forced to be involved even as voyeurs without consent and *without being able to challenge it lest they are deemed bigots or even worse arrested for some "hate crime"*.
But, the public will only go so far.
And the backlash could become very bloody and harsh.
The "weaker" ones - like the boy you mentioned - will be harmed first. The stronger ones will get harmed next. Those few who have decided that living as the opposite sex in whatever form they *think* that is but who do NOT impose on the spaces of the opposite sex, will become shameful collateral in this backlash. As will, I suspect, LGB whose genuine civil rights movement was to just be equal in that their sexual orientation was private but not grounds for discrimination.
The French Revolution started off with genuine issues due to the huge gaping chasm between rich and poor. However, too many of the aristocrats were killed who were innocent - they cared for their tenants, helped the poor and did what they could as was their duty. Children were executed - simply for being the child of an aristocrat. Poorer people and the bourgeoisie, who saw the revolution was going too far, were arrested and often were executed for not supporting the narrative.
The leaders of the Revolution then faced the backlash....even Robespierre - architect, followed the King and Queen to the guillotine.
I fear that when the backlash occurs - too many will be swept up as collateral...innocent victims and the pendulum will then swing too far the other way.
Humans never learn.
"Sam Smith is a chunky gay with a decent voice, and I’m not saying he is a pervert."
I am.
Perfect. Absolutely perfect.
Jenny, Jenny...
NO SUCH LUCK!
https://postimg.cc/8fsRYCNm
After a certain threshold is surpassed the only way to return BALANCE to it is by absolute destruction. In our case in entertainment this means biological extinction.
We just need to wait for it.