Society celebrates the hideous, the deviant and the compulsively transgressive. The result? Fat Satan aka Sam Smith, and other -- far more horrifying-- things
In a way I'm glad that the Woke are doubling down on gender ideology. They've chosen the perfect hill to die on. It gives me hope that the Woke house of cards could come crashing down all at once.
Yes I am inclined to agree with you. I think that this is their Achilles heel, it's so horrifying that it's activating people. I just hope it's not too late.
Excellent piece, Jenny! I was also aghast at BB's pro rape-porn guest and her complete rejection of sexual morality. Also I loved your phrase "go all Taliban on their knicker-wearing asses" lol.
BB also made an insinuation that women treat sex as a transaction when he asked MM about the stuff guys buy for her, saying "when a guy buys you a car or pays for your apartment." This also shows how some men believe women get everything they have from men. I loved her response, but I would not have been so nice.
Yes, I was very disappointed in how chill he was. It's always so disheartening to see an otherwise intelligent man lose his critical faculties when faced with an attractive woman. It's embarrassing.
What he said is so ridiculous - not only most women don't get everything they have from men, but in reality only some women are rewarded in material terms for having sex with men. He is clearly talking about the trophy girlfriends of wealthy guys or about "sugar babies", not about ordinary women.
There's a sad and terrifying game of civilizational chicken being played here: can western society successfully wait these people out? That is, can a society exist that gives these people just enough space to live their sad lives and die (because they don't reproduce), without becoming long-term damaged by it? That ignore-it-and-hope-it-goes-away mindset is what's keeping the baseball bats put away, for now. We'll see how long it lasts.
This is a very good summation, but I think they have already done enormous damage. Incalculable, even. I'm afraid we may have lost one, maybe two, generations of young people. Just look at the horror stories from de-transitioners, the physical butchery they have been subjected to. Look at the child rape internet content epidemic. I am quite liberal on matters of sexual behaviour (not by these standards, obvs!), so I fear the repression backlash. But this is a nightmare situation we are in.
Oh, they reproduce because they put vulnerable child and teenagers in horrid situations and cause them to think this deviancy is normal. I have friends who honestly did not know that is was okay to say no or stop or call for help because they had seen so much. Research knows sexual abuse in children leads to confusion and promiscuity later in life. In an aside, most of my gay friends were sexually abused as children.
I don't disagree. This is the horrid arithmetic being practiced here: what's the acceptable level of damage, and when does it create permanent problems such that the whole thing must be responded to? More bluntly, how many messed-up kids is too many for this whole thing to be tolerated? And even when that point is passed, the game continues: at what point must I, an individual, act? How long can I wait for "someone to do something" before I recognize and accept that I might be the someone? Each of us has to answer that for ourselves.
Yes, I think that it may well be porn-related. The man has been actually sometimes joking on his Facebook about seeing online ads for products for people who are into extreme sexual stuff. I think that people don't see such ads if they are not into such things...
I can only hope that he is not being abusive to his wife in some way. She may have low self-esteem because she is very overweight (of course I am not saying that every overweight woman has low self-esteem!) and not conventionally attractive. I don't think that a confident woman would patiently put up with this situation, unless she were completely brainwashed by the gender identity cult.
I think we're missing some important voices here; men who've worked at escorts. I spent a little bit of time talking to an adult male who had worked as an escort to wealthy women and he said it was a terrible business and the women and men who buy escorts love the power over another human being and he was usually treated very badly. The industry is not healthy for men or women.
This isn't about sex workers, who admittedly have a miserable existence. This is about perverts who force themselves upon women and girls in vulnerable positions.
My 90+ year old uncle predicted this when "Gay Marriage" was allowed. He said " It is not the normal
sexual preference, it should not be condoned. Let them do what they want in the privacy of their own homes but to condone it and make it appear as normal and as acceptable as the natural sexual preference is wrong. Because once you accept a difference sexual preference to the norm as being the same as the norm, at what point does society say this sexual preference is a preference too far?"
This is an extremely controversial take -- a cancelable offence, even! But it is a valid question: if multiple sexual preferences are totally fine, then how do you decide which are not? I am comfortable with drawing the line at age, but admittedly, that does not seem to be strong enough. Does that mean that I'm totally fine with two adults engaging in scat? (If you don't know what this, don't look it up.) Or -- as this woman says -- rape porn? Adult brother and sister? I'm not ok with any of that. We have created an absolute quagmire. We need to claw back sexual virtue, somehow.
It may be controversial, it may be a cancelable offence, but it is true. I don't know what scat is and I will take your advice not to look it up, just the name is off-putting enough without knowing the reality. I am hopeful however it will be clawed back, though perhaps more slowly than one might like.
IF some of the news I read pre-christmas regarding 'Drag Queens' and 'butt monkey' being given access to children to tell stories then we effectively have paedophiles in the guise of fanciful dressed characters being given access to children and people in authority condoning it.
I believe the more hopeful news is that this perversion has only survived because the authority of the powers that should have stood up against it - Christian Churches were first destroyed by the hypocrisy and perversions exposed in them. Though not every priest was a pervert, their authority was destroyed.
Once the Churches had lost that moral authority the perverted revelled in their freedom and as with most things, the majority of the population simply got on with life. In fact I suspect they didn't realise just what was going on in the education system for example, so didn't respond at first, then later probably because they didn't believe it. That our ruling elites seemed to take it on-board then made it increasingly difficult for them to do so, but now it has gone too far and the backlash has begun because so many are shocked by what is claimed to be normal and the fact children are the main target for the most advertised perversions.
For example, the Trans movement and the Tavistock clinic seemed, and still seem, intent on pushing that ideology' onto children. It is child abuse and just as the Savile and the BBC were eventually exposed, now the Tavistock and its heinous legacy is being exposed so there is some hope. Once the Trans child abuse is defeated, then I hope the others will quickly be defeated too.
My personal opinion however is that it is not sufficient to just put these perversions out of the public domain, The damage has been done, and I believe someone needs to be held to account, prosecuted even, and the higher up the hierarchy that prosecution the better.
History and the world are full of cycles of what one might call Righteousness and Perversion. I think parents are the ones who will eventually defeat perversions, because having children appears to produce a surprising change in mentality and perhaps it will be the mothers of the UK who destroy the political groups who appear to appease, or even support these perversions. I hope so.
But when it comes to consenting adults - IF I/Society, doesn't know about it and the consequences of it are not inflicted upon any other non-consenting individual then I wouldn't go around seeking it out. The irony seems to me that the perverts are so confident in their power that they don't seek privacy and concealment, they seek to proselytise and attack those who believe it is perversion. Having seen some of the marchers in the local 'Pride' marches, it maybe time to stop them too.
Also I don't believe it is just the perversions that are a problem when it comes to social interactions. The lack of reality in the mindsets of many who aren't perverted is frightening, their education strikes me as being deficient. In terms of fashion for instance, there is a happy medium between say the Burka and some of the outlandish bits of clothing celebrities wear at their public events.
I have massive sympathy for the youth of today. Interpersonal relationships and creating them must be an even bigger nightmare then when I was trying to form them over half-a-century ago!
It amazes me how widespread the idea that a person can dress how they want and believe that it means nothing and conveys nothing to observers but the meaning the wearer attributes to it, is risible. Human communication has, like in any other animal species, been subject to multi-millennia of evolutionary processes. Non-verbal communication is powerful - here is the first couple of paragraphs from
While the key to success in both personal and professional relationships lies in your ability to communicate well, it’s not the words that you use but your nonverbal cues or “body language” that speak the loudest. Body language is the use of physical behavior, expressions, and mannerisms to communicate nonverbally, often done instinctively rather than consciously.
Whether you’re aware of it or not, when you interact with others, you’re continuously giving and receiving wordless signals. All of your nonverbal behaviors—the gestures you make, your posture, your tone of voice, how much eye contact you make—send strong messages. They can put people at ease, build trust, and draw others towards you, or they can offend, confuse, and undermine what you’re trying to convey. These messages don’t stop when you stop speaking either. Even when you’re silent, you’re still communicating nonverbally."
============
I would go further and say how you dress and the social norms that have developed around dress are not 'neutral' - they too produce messages that may not be the message you think you are sending if you decide that what was the norm is 'old fashioned' and so adopt some extreme ) your own or some other new fashion. Maybe someone needs to ask Sam Smith what message exactly he intended to send with his black rubber suit, because the one I received when I noticed it in the news firmly put it in the 'perverse' domain. Perhaps he has explained. I wasn't interested, but a photograph on a news web site inevitably put the image into my head whether I like it or not.
Finally those cycles I mentioned earlier do appear to the non-expert like me to be related to era's and the perversions appear during a Fin de siècle period. I look at many other aspects of the Western Civilisation, politics, education, economics etc, and it strikes me we are experiencing a Fin de siècle period. Should the US/NATO not tread carefully in Ukraine we may discover the world experiencing it and potentially, THE Fin de siècle event. However, hope springs eternal!
"History and the world are full of cycles of what one might call Righteousness and Perversion."
I'm not able to give this very interesting comment the response it deserves right now, but I did want to say that this particular sentence is an extremely useful way to processing our reality right now. It's always helpful to remember that there is nothing new under the sun...deviance, cruelty, corruption, they are all as old as time. For some reason I find that a comforting thought. Thank you!
On the what I call "Trans Industrial Complex" Jon Uhler has serious experience with sex abuse counseling for some 30 years and it's heartening to see someone of his professional merit see that we are dealing with not merely some organic devolution in society, but also a concerted managed project by the Mainstream to promote this. Why the Mainstream would do this is of course a good question, but that it is doing it seems unreasonable to deny at this point.
Secondly, he sees it's not just an assault on women, it's also part of a darker process with a goal of normalizing pedophilia. He's back on Twitter from a ban, and he has a YT channel. @uhler_jon
The term "transgressive" sounds sort of cute, like being blissfully uninterested in every little insignificant man-made rule that somebody somewhere dreamed up when they didn't have anything better to do that day, but a lot of the stuff that we see today in many aspects of our culture is about something light years worse. It is about evil. God is not a fan of evil, and one's eternal destination is very much at stake if one chooses to persist in it and ignore or oppose God.
Once upon a time, we told pervs to "get a room". Now, thanks to social media, the whole world is their room. Personally I would be happy if all the satellites fall out of the sky ( or the Americans shoot them down)!
Great writing. That’s the crucial thing here. You can write anything if you write well. I really believe this. Art. The stuff about you as a kid in a Brooklyn school girl's room is great writing. I also owe you an email. ❤️
In the 18th century there was a lot of "accepted" debauchery. And then the backlash occurred and we get the 19th century apparent "prudity". Of course, it wasn't entirely that - victorians were a sexual as any humans through time, but there was more of a sense of it was private and not open to all.
There were moves to protect the child - children in the past were very often abused. It is one reason why girls in particular were so sheltered, made to understand that *reputation* was very important. Even in the more permissive 18th century (see the story of Dangerous Liaisons....bored wealthy people using sex to get their power kicks, and using anyone they like to do so. See also the Marquis de Sade).
Yet, a girl, in the 18th century who had any outside of marriage relations and it become known, was left on the proverbial shelf. 17th century Moll Flanders shows what happened to poorer women who had to make their way in life.
We are now in a situation whereby Females can control their fertility. The old concept of women can do and be "like" men (aka Ladette culture in the 90s) has now led to the concept that women can have open sexual relationships with no boundaries. Of course, if you are an adult, you can't be stopped from indulging *in your own private space with consenting adults*, but....the difference now is that there a vocal minority with an awful lot of influence and a set of politicians the world over who seem to be "so open minded their brains have fallen out" (thank you Magdalen Berns) who are listening too hard.
This influential minority see and saw a golden opportunity to perform their perversions (because rape kink is a perversion....NO ONE can consent to it even as role play) in the "public square" as it were **and thus to force everyone else to participate without consent**. The very fact that these perversions are being "normalised" in media, on the internet, in schools (yes! by the very fact of denying that sex is binary etc), in law (yes!! State sanctioning of these concepts.) means society as a whole is now involved.
Of course thats the other element. Its not very "power and euphoric" to do this at home and in private. So much better if others are forced to be involved even as voyeurs without consent and *without being able to challenge it lest they are deemed bigots or even worse arrested for some "hate crime"*.
But, the public will only go so far.
And the backlash could become very bloody and harsh.
The "weaker" ones - like the boy you mentioned - will be harmed first. The stronger ones will get harmed next. Those few who have decided that living as the opposite sex in whatever form they *think* that is but who do NOT impose on the spaces of the opposite sex, will become shameful collateral in this backlash. As will, I suspect, LGB whose genuine civil rights movement was to just be equal in that their sexual orientation was private but not grounds for discrimination.
The French Revolution started off with genuine issues due to the huge gaping chasm between rich and poor. However, too many of the aristocrats were killed who were innocent - they cared for their tenants, helped the poor and did what they could as was their duty. Children were executed - simply for being the child of an aristocrat. Poorer people and the bourgeoisie, who saw the revolution was going too far, were arrested and often were executed for not supporting the narrative.
The leaders of the Revolution then faced the backlash....even Robespierre - architect, followed the King and Queen to the guillotine.
I fear that when the backlash occurs - too many will be swept up as collateral...innocent victims and the pendulum will then swing too far the other way.
After a certain threshold is surpassed the only way to return BALANCE to it is by absolute destruction. In our case in entertainment this means biological extinction.
What was the first Thought your Brain processed? Uncensored...
Unfortunately it's not a question of "do" or "not do". Degeneration final destination is always the same, the only thing that changes is the Time to reach it.
It won't be for my and yours lifetime for sure but there is no way to get around it. Not even escaping to Mars will do the trick!
In a way I'm glad that the Woke are doubling down on gender ideology. They've chosen the perfect hill to die on. It gives me hope that the Woke house of cards could come crashing down all at once.
Yes I am inclined to agree with you. I think that this is their Achilles heel, it's so horrifying that it's activating people. I just hope it's not too late.
Excellent piece, Jenny! I was also aghast at BB's pro rape-porn guest and her complete rejection of sexual morality. Also I loved your phrase "go all Taliban on their knicker-wearing asses" lol.
BB also made an insinuation that women treat sex as a transaction when he asked MM about the stuff guys buy for her, saying "when a guy buys you a car or pays for your apartment." This also shows how some men believe women get everything they have from men. I loved her response, but I would not have been so nice.
Yes, I was very disappointed in how chill he was. It's always so disheartening to see an otherwise intelligent man lose his critical faculties when faced with an attractive woman. It's embarrassing.
What he said is so ridiculous - not only most women don't get everything they have from men, but in reality only some women are rewarded in material terms for having sex with men. He is clearly talking about the trophy girlfriends of wealthy guys or about "sugar babies", not about ordinary women.
His question showed how some men and women see the sex lives of women as always transactional.
There's a sad and terrifying game of civilizational chicken being played here: can western society successfully wait these people out? That is, can a society exist that gives these people just enough space to live their sad lives and die (because they don't reproduce), without becoming long-term damaged by it? That ignore-it-and-hope-it-goes-away mindset is what's keeping the baseball bats put away, for now. We'll see how long it lasts.
This is a very good summation, but I think they have already done enormous damage. Incalculable, even. I'm afraid we may have lost one, maybe two, generations of young people. Just look at the horror stories from de-transitioners, the physical butchery they have been subjected to. Look at the child rape internet content epidemic. I am quite liberal on matters of sexual behaviour (not by these standards, obvs!), so I fear the repression backlash. But this is a nightmare situation we are in.
Oh, they reproduce because they put vulnerable child and teenagers in horrid situations and cause them to think this deviancy is normal. I have friends who honestly did not know that is was okay to say no or stop or call for help because they had seen so much. Research knows sexual abuse in children leads to confusion and promiscuity later in life. In an aside, most of my gay friends were sexually abused as children.
This is very interesting. We have really destroyed children's boundaries. And bad behaviour always affects a wide swath of people, doesn't it?
I don't disagree. This is the horrid arithmetic being practiced here: what's the acceptable level of damage, and when does it create permanent problems such that the whole thing must be responded to? More bluntly, how many messed-up kids is too many for this whole thing to be tolerated? And even when that point is passed, the game continues: at what point must I, an individual, act? How long can I wait for "someone to do something" before I recognize and accept that I might be the someone? Each of us has to answer that for ourselves.
Some of these people do reproduce. I know a man who "came out as trans" after his wife gave birth to their child. His wife is still married to him.
Awful. Do you think it was porn-related?
Yes, I think that it may well be porn-related. The man has been actually sometimes joking on his Facebook about seeing online ads for products for people who are into extreme sexual stuff. I think that people don't see such ads if they are not into such things...
I can only hope that he is not being abusive to his wife in some way. She may have low self-esteem because she is very overweight (of course I am not saying that every overweight woman has low self-esteem!) and not conventionally attractive. I don't think that a confident woman would patiently put up with this situation, unless she were completely brainwashed by the gender identity cult.
I think we're missing some important voices here; men who've worked at escorts. I spent a little bit of time talking to an adult male who had worked as an escort to wealthy women and he said it was a terrible business and the women and men who buy escorts love the power over another human being and he was usually treated very badly. The industry is not healthy for men or women.
Yes! I agree! Very interesting.
Also we must resist the idea that women are somehow above sordid desires and terrible behaviour. That's not the case, at all.
This isn't about sex workers, who admittedly have a miserable existence. This is about perverts who force themselves upon women and girls in vulnerable positions.
I should have stated that my comment was made in reference to the Boyce interview of Meghan Murphy and Aella.
My 90+ year old uncle predicted this when "Gay Marriage" was allowed. He said " It is not the normal
sexual preference, it should not be condoned. Let them do what they want in the privacy of their own homes but to condone it and make it appear as normal and as acceptable as the natural sexual preference is wrong. Because once you accept a difference sexual preference to the norm as being the same as the norm, at what point does society say this sexual preference is a preference too far?"
This is an extremely controversial take -- a cancelable offence, even! But it is a valid question: if multiple sexual preferences are totally fine, then how do you decide which are not? I am comfortable with drawing the line at age, but admittedly, that does not seem to be strong enough. Does that mean that I'm totally fine with two adults engaging in scat? (If you don't know what this, don't look it up.) Or -- as this woman says -- rape porn? Adult brother and sister? I'm not ok with any of that. We have created an absolute quagmire. We need to claw back sexual virtue, somehow.
It may be controversial, it may be a cancelable offence, but it is true. I don't know what scat is and I will take your advice not to look it up, just the name is off-putting enough without knowing the reality. I am hopeful however it will be clawed back, though perhaps more slowly than one might like.
IF some of the news I read pre-christmas regarding 'Drag Queens' and 'butt monkey' being given access to children to tell stories then we effectively have paedophiles in the guise of fanciful dressed characters being given access to children and people in authority condoning it.
I believe the more hopeful news is that this perversion has only survived because the authority of the powers that should have stood up against it - Christian Churches were first destroyed by the hypocrisy and perversions exposed in them. Though not every priest was a pervert, their authority was destroyed.
Once the Churches had lost that moral authority the perverted revelled in their freedom and as with most things, the majority of the population simply got on with life. In fact I suspect they didn't realise just what was going on in the education system for example, so didn't respond at first, then later probably because they didn't believe it. That our ruling elites seemed to take it on-board then made it increasingly difficult for them to do so, but now it has gone too far and the backlash has begun because so many are shocked by what is claimed to be normal and the fact children are the main target for the most advertised perversions.
For example, the Trans movement and the Tavistock clinic seemed, and still seem, intent on pushing that ideology' onto children. It is child abuse and just as the Savile and the BBC were eventually exposed, now the Tavistock and its heinous legacy is being exposed so there is some hope. Once the Trans child abuse is defeated, then I hope the others will quickly be defeated too.
My personal opinion however is that it is not sufficient to just put these perversions out of the public domain, The damage has been done, and I believe someone needs to be held to account, prosecuted even, and the higher up the hierarchy that prosecution the better.
History and the world are full of cycles of what one might call Righteousness and Perversion. I think parents are the ones who will eventually defeat perversions, because having children appears to produce a surprising change in mentality and perhaps it will be the mothers of the UK who destroy the political groups who appear to appease, or even support these perversions. I hope so.
But when it comes to consenting adults - IF I/Society, doesn't know about it and the consequences of it are not inflicted upon any other non-consenting individual then I wouldn't go around seeking it out. The irony seems to me that the perverts are so confident in their power that they don't seek privacy and concealment, they seek to proselytise and attack those who believe it is perversion. Having seen some of the marchers in the local 'Pride' marches, it maybe time to stop them too.
Also I don't believe it is just the perversions that are a problem when it comes to social interactions. The lack of reality in the mindsets of many who aren't perverted is frightening, their education strikes me as being deficient. In terms of fashion for instance, there is a happy medium between say the Burka and some of the outlandish bits of clothing celebrities wear at their public events.
I have massive sympathy for the youth of today. Interpersonal relationships and creating them must be an even bigger nightmare then when I was trying to form them over half-a-century ago!
It amazes me how widespread the idea that a person can dress how they want and believe that it means nothing and conveys nothing to observers but the meaning the wearer attributes to it, is risible. Human communication has, like in any other animal species, been subject to multi-millennia of evolutionary processes. Non-verbal communication is powerful - here is the first couple of paragraphs from
https://www.helpguide.org/articles/relationships-communication/nonverbal-communication.htm
===============
"What is body language?
While the key to success in both personal and professional relationships lies in your ability to communicate well, it’s not the words that you use but your nonverbal cues or “body language” that speak the loudest. Body language is the use of physical behavior, expressions, and mannerisms to communicate nonverbally, often done instinctively rather than consciously.
Whether you’re aware of it or not, when you interact with others, you’re continuously giving and receiving wordless signals. All of your nonverbal behaviors—the gestures you make, your posture, your tone of voice, how much eye contact you make—send strong messages. They can put people at ease, build trust, and draw others towards you, or they can offend, confuse, and undermine what you’re trying to convey. These messages don’t stop when you stop speaking either. Even when you’re silent, you’re still communicating nonverbally."
============
I would go further and say how you dress and the social norms that have developed around dress are not 'neutral' - they too produce messages that may not be the message you think you are sending if you decide that what was the norm is 'old fashioned' and so adopt some extreme ) your own or some other new fashion. Maybe someone needs to ask Sam Smith what message exactly he intended to send with his black rubber suit, because the one I received when I noticed it in the news firmly put it in the 'perverse' domain. Perhaps he has explained. I wasn't interested, but a photograph on a news web site inevitably put the image into my head whether I like it or not.
Finally those cycles I mentioned earlier do appear to the non-expert like me to be related to era's and the perversions appear during a Fin de siècle period. I look at many other aspects of the Western Civilisation, politics, education, economics etc, and it strikes me we are experiencing a Fin de siècle period. Should the US/NATO not tread carefully in Ukraine we may discover the world experiencing it and potentially, THE Fin de siècle event. However, hope springs eternal!
"History and the world are full of cycles of what one might call Righteousness and Perversion."
I'm not able to give this very interesting comment the response it deserves right now, but I did want to say that this particular sentence is an extremely useful way to processing our reality right now. It's always helpful to remember that there is nothing new under the sun...deviance, cruelty, corruption, they are all as old as time. For some reason I find that a comforting thought. Thank you!
On the what I call "Trans Industrial Complex" Jon Uhler has serious experience with sex abuse counseling for some 30 years and it's heartening to see someone of his professional merit see that we are dealing with not merely some organic devolution in society, but also a concerted managed project by the Mainstream to promote this. Why the Mainstream would do this is of course a good question, but that it is doing it seems unreasonable to deny at this point.
Secondly, he sees it's not just an assault on women, it's also part of a darker process with a goal of normalizing pedophilia. He's back on Twitter from a ban, and he has a YT channel. @uhler_jon
I will look him up, thanks for the tip.
Every day I think I can’t be surprised any more. And then, again, I’m proved wrong.
The term "transgressive" sounds sort of cute, like being blissfully uninterested in every little insignificant man-made rule that somebody somewhere dreamed up when they didn't have anything better to do that day, but a lot of the stuff that we see today in many aspects of our culture is about something light years worse. It is about evil. God is not a fan of evil, and one's eternal destination is very much at stake if one chooses to persist in it and ignore or oppose God.
Once upon a time, we told pervs to "get a room". Now, thanks to social media, the whole world is their room. Personally I would be happy if all the satellites fall out of the sky ( or the Americans shoot them down)!
I loved the cartoon you sent me, btw!
I found the juxtaposition between power and dignity in this post interesting. Love your work, thanks ;-)
Thank you!
Great writing. That’s the crucial thing here. You can write anything if you write well. I really believe this. Art. The stuff about you as a kid in a Brooklyn school girl's room is great writing. I also owe you an email. ❤️
Thank you! And now I owe you one....
In the 18th century there was a lot of "accepted" debauchery. And then the backlash occurred and we get the 19th century apparent "prudity". Of course, it wasn't entirely that - victorians were a sexual as any humans through time, but there was more of a sense of it was private and not open to all.
There were moves to protect the child - children in the past were very often abused. It is one reason why girls in particular were so sheltered, made to understand that *reputation* was very important. Even in the more permissive 18th century (see the story of Dangerous Liaisons....bored wealthy people using sex to get their power kicks, and using anyone they like to do so. See also the Marquis de Sade).
Yet, a girl, in the 18th century who had any outside of marriage relations and it become known, was left on the proverbial shelf. 17th century Moll Flanders shows what happened to poorer women who had to make their way in life.
We are now in a situation whereby Females can control their fertility. The old concept of women can do and be "like" men (aka Ladette culture in the 90s) has now led to the concept that women can have open sexual relationships with no boundaries. Of course, if you are an adult, you can't be stopped from indulging *in your own private space with consenting adults*, but....the difference now is that there a vocal minority with an awful lot of influence and a set of politicians the world over who seem to be "so open minded their brains have fallen out" (thank you Magdalen Berns) who are listening too hard.
This influential minority see and saw a golden opportunity to perform their perversions (because rape kink is a perversion....NO ONE can consent to it even as role play) in the "public square" as it were **and thus to force everyone else to participate without consent**. The very fact that these perversions are being "normalised" in media, on the internet, in schools (yes! by the very fact of denying that sex is binary etc), in law (yes!! State sanctioning of these concepts.) means society as a whole is now involved.
Of course thats the other element. Its not very "power and euphoric" to do this at home and in private. So much better if others are forced to be involved even as voyeurs without consent and *without being able to challenge it lest they are deemed bigots or even worse arrested for some "hate crime"*.
But, the public will only go so far.
And the backlash could become very bloody and harsh.
The "weaker" ones - like the boy you mentioned - will be harmed first. The stronger ones will get harmed next. Those few who have decided that living as the opposite sex in whatever form they *think* that is but who do NOT impose on the spaces of the opposite sex, will become shameful collateral in this backlash. As will, I suspect, LGB whose genuine civil rights movement was to just be equal in that their sexual orientation was private but not grounds for discrimination.
The French Revolution started off with genuine issues due to the huge gaping chasm between rich and poor. However, too many of the aristocrats were killed who were innocent - they cared for their tenants, helped the poor and did what they could as was their duty. Children were executed - simply for being the child of an aristocrat. Poorer people and the bourgeoisie, who saw the revolution was going too far, were arrested and often were executed for not supporting the narrative.
The leaders of the Revolution then faced the backlash....even Robespierre - architect, followed the King and Queen to the guillotine.
I fear that when the backlash occurs - too many will be swept up as collateral...innocent victims and the pendulum will then swing too far the other way.
Humans never learn.
"Sam Smith is a chunky gay with a decent voice, and I’m not saying he is a pervert."
I am.
Perfect. Absolutely perfect.
Jenny, Jenny...
NO SUCH LUCK!
https://postimg.cc/8fsRYCNm
After a certain threshold is surpassed the only way to return BALANCE to it is by absolute destruction. In our case in entertainment this means biological extinction.
We just need to wait for it.
I wish you had warned me what was on the other end of that link.
I also disagree that destruction and extinction are the answer -- that's a hard no from me. I don't do nihilism.
What was the first Thought your Brain processed? Uncensored...
Unfortunately it's not a question of "do" or "not do". Degeneration final destination is always the same, the only thing that changes is the Time to reach it.
It won't be for my and yours lifetime for sure but there is no way to get around it. Not even escaping to Mars will do the trick!