Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Shewbridge's avatar

I love your writing, and respect you a lot, which is why I think it's worth sharing my different perspective here.

I can't understand how faith is the opposite of certainty, and nor do you explain that. And from what you've written here, it seems that you see faith as a sanctuary from uncertainty.

I don't know anyone, other than mindless ideologues, who sees science as a source of certainty. At its best, science is an indicator of your best bet. Science will never prove anything beyond all doubt, and I'm entirely comfortable with that. Science can tell me what is most likely to be true given the data we have so far, and that's enough. Knowing the odds is as good as it gets.

And that's enough because I'm comfortable with doubt, and comfortable with being shown to be wrong. Like you, I've acted with certainty and been proven wrong many times, but that hasn't shaken me in the way it seems to have shaken you.

I don't see faith as the opposite of certainty, but as a refuge from doubt. That refuge works so well because the faiths around us have retreated into making only unfalsifiable claims; that's their cast iron guarantee of never, ever being wrong.

But there are an infinite number of faiths we could invent, all replete with unfalisfiable claims, and I don't see what they would offer me. They survive by making claims with no ties to reality whatsoever, and I'm not sure I'm supposed to do with that.

Because I'd rather be wrong, than not even wrong.

Expand full comment
Who’s in Charge?'s avatar

And with doubt comes humility which is is in short supply these days, unfortunately the hubris of the certain may yet drive us to ruin.

Expand full comment
79 more comments...

No posts