Forcing healthy children to submit to unwanted medical procedures is evil. Evil is back.
Wake up. Pick a side.
A few days ago my mother had her weekly Italian lesson, which is given by a very sweet woman who lives in the village. A petite and warm woman with a sing-song voice, she works as a cashier in a shop and is also a single mother.
On Tuesday she arrived at my mother’s house distraught. She is horrified that the Italian state will shortly be forcing her to submit her children to a medical experiment that is politely being called the COVID vaccine. If they do not submit, they will legally be disallowed from going to restaurants, cinemas, concerts and school.
She recounted how she took one of her children, a 15 year old, to the doctor at Rome’s preeminent children’s medical centre for a routine appointment. When the doctors badgered her about getting the child vaccinated, she requested that her child receive a non-mRNA vaccine and asked instead for one of the more tried-and-tested methods of inoculation. The doctors reacted with horror, yelling at her that the mRNA shot was proven to be the safest one and no, she couldn’t have the old-fashioned vaccine for her daughter.
Tell that to the family of the teen who died in his sleep days after taking it, and the families of the boys who developed inflammation of the heart after taking it.
I am not a scientist, and I am not anti-vaccines generally. Pretty much everyone I love in the US has taken the mRNA vaccine, which means I have a strong vested interest in them being safe. And I have heard sensible arguments as to why older people (who are vulnerable to death-by-COVID) should get the vaccine. But I have also heard enough highly credible scientists raise truly frightening concerns about it generally, as well as many anecdotal reports of sudden unexplained deaths in young people, and that is enough for me. It is is my right — it was my right — to say no. I do not consent.
Watch this:
I am haunted by this mother’s anguish. It has forced me to think about what my options will be, should my government try to coerce my family in the way that the Italian and French governments are doing.
I had planned on writing this week’s letter about some observations I had made recently of the credulousness of the people who claim these days to be liberal. After hearing this woman’s lament I decided to share with you the reality on the ground of these criminal (because they are criminal) mandates. But then it struck me that that credulousness among liberals is actually linked to this woman’s plight. The baffling willingness on the part of the liberal and educated classes to submit their children to this government and Big Pharma racket is the very thing that is buttressing what is rapidly becoming tyranny for those of us who do not consent.
Take, for example, Heather Cox Richardson, an American history professor who has a wildly popular newsletter, which I also subscribe to.
The other week her missive contained the following statement:
“It is literally the government’s job to protect us.” She followed this shockingly naive opinion with the preamble to the US constitution, as evidence to her claim.
It reads:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.”
I wholeheartedly reject this woman’s interpretation of these words. “Provide for” and “promote” do not translate to “mandate” and “coerce.” Does she not understand what words mean?
How hideously sheltered and dangerously trusting is this woman — and she’s a history teacher to boot. As the kids say, SMH.
I also just finished the autobiography of Gloria Steinem, in which she thoroughly lives up to her self-confessed CIA proclivities — in writing one of the more inane pieces of propaganda I’ve ever read. Though she styles herself a renegade and an outsider, this is her analysis of two of the most powerful and insider-y figures in American history — Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
She writes:
“But to me, their shared content was way more important than different forms. She was a civil rights advocate. He was a feminist. They were a modern-day echo of the abolitionist and suffragist era, when black men, black women and white women — the groups white male supremacists had worked so hard and cruelly to keep apart — turned this country on its head by working together for universal adult suffrage.”
Wow. Talk about speaking truth to power.
Nowhere in these banal drippings is an acknowledgement of governmental powers’ long history of malfeasance, even evil. Nowhere in the musings of these two highly respected liberals is an acknowledgement of the blood shed by working class white men who fought vicious battles against the combined might of the federal government and monopoly capitalists.
Now, until very recently I had a mostly favourable view of the state, because properly-run democracies (the kind which the US and Europe briefly were, maybe) are flawed but the best option going.
But power unchecked and unchallenged will always do wrong. And they ALWAYS claim to be doing it for the safety of the majority. And not just in the United States.
Tuskegee experiment, anyone?
The Third Reich?
The Mother and Baby Homes and Magdalen Laundries?
The Gulag?
The Thalidomide scandal?
I have stumbled upon the greatest con job that has ever been pulled: when power convinced the “educated” that power was harmless, one their side even. (Never mind the logical inconsistency of the progressive left running around demanding more state power when they also claim that state is irredeemably and structurally racist. Why would you do anything the state said if you thought that?)
The blind trust that the liberal population has for this obvious destruction of personal sovereignty may incur a shocking reckoning for them, and soon. The co-opting of the intelligentsia and expert class by a blatantly corrupt and dangerous power class means that they may never deserve our trust or respect again. A plague on both their houses.
Who forces a mother to submit her heathy children to a medical practice she does not want and that they do not need?
Who mandates medical procedures on healthy children without consent?
Evil does.
Evil is back.
Wake up.
Pick a side.